U.S. Trade Investigation Into Legacy Semiconductors: A Strategic Move To Counter China's Growing Market Domination


12/23/2024



In a move that signals a continuation of tough trade policies against China, the Biden administration announced a new trade investigation into the import of Chinese-made "legacy" semiconductors. This announcement, made just weeks before President-elect Donald Trump is set to take office, could pave the way for further tariffs on chips that are integral to everyday goods such as automobiles, washing machines, and telecommunications equipment. The investigation, launched under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, highlights ongoing concerns about China’s increasing dominance in the semiconductor industry, especially in legacy chips that are vital to many mass-market applications.
 
The timing of the probe is noteworthy, as it sets the stage for the incoming Trump administration to take over the investigation upon his inauguration. With Trump’s strong stance on imposing high tariffs on Chinese imports, the investigation offers a clear path for him to implement the heavy tariffs he has threatened, potentially as high as 60% on Chinese goods. This investigation continues the trade war dynamics that have been a hallmark of U.S.-China relations, particularly in the semiconductor industry, which is seen as a critical component of both technological innovation and national security.
 
The focus of the investigation is on legacy semiconductors, which are produced using older manufacturing processes and are used in a wide array of products that power industries ranging from automotive to medical devices. These chips are not as advanced as the next-generation chips used for artificial intelligence or other cutting-edge technologies, but they are still crucial for basic consumer goods. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), led by Katherine Tai, argues that China's state-backed semiconductor production is artificially driving down the prices of these chips, undermining market-driven competition in the global marketplace. Tai’s comments point to a broader concern about China’s economic strategy, which has been focused on dominating key industries, such as steel, solar panels, and electric vehicles, by relying on heavy state support.
 
This trade probe has deeper implications than just tariffs. According to U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, two-thirds of U.S. products containing chips are using Chinese legacy semiconductors, with a concerning number of U.S. companies unaware of the origins of the chips they use—especially in critical sectors like defense. Raimondo’s findings suggest that the U.S. is becoming increasingly dependent on Chinese semiconductor production, an issue made all the more urgent by the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The semiconductor shortage, which led to production halts in essential sectors such as automotive and medical devices, highlighted the vulnerabilities of the U.S. supply chain.
 
In response to these vulnerabilities, the U.S. has already begun efforts to rebuild its semiconductor supply chain. The Biden administration has allocated $52.7 billion in subsidies for semiconductor manufacturing, research, and workforce development in an effort to reduce dependency on foreign producers. However, the U.S. faces significant competition from China, which is expected to produce more than 60% of the world’s legacy chip capacity in the next decade. This projection has raised alarms in Washington, as it could not only discourage further U.S. investment in chip manufacturing but also increase the dependency on Chinese semiconductors, thus undermining the U.S.’s strategic position in the global market.
 
This latest investigation also underscores the ongoing tensions between China and the U.S. over trade practices and industrial policies. While the Biden administration has largely continued many of the trade policies initiated by the Trump administration, the underlying issues remain the same: China’s aggressive industrial policies, designed to position its companies at the forefront of global markets, and the U.S.’s struggle to maintain its competitive edge. This tension is particularly pronounced in industries such as semiconductors, where the competition is not just about technology but also about national security, with critical applications ranging from defense systems to communications infrastructure.
 
The investigation into legacy semiconductors follows a series of similar actions taken by the U.S. government to combat China's trade practices. Under Section 301, a statute that allows the U.S. to impose tariffs on foreign goods deemed to be unfairly subsidized or damaging to U.S. industries, the Biden administration is taking a hardline stance against China. The U.S. has already imposed tariffs on Chinese semiconductors, solar panels, and electric vehicles, and the new investigation is expected to add further pressure to China’s semiconductor sector.
 
While the investigation has yet to produce definitive conclusions, its implications for both countries could be far-reaching. The probe will examine not only the effects of Chinese-made legacy chips on U.S. companies but also their incorporation into critical downstream goods used in industries such as defense, automotive, and medical devices. If the investigation finds that China's semiconductor practices are harming U.S. companies, it could lead to additional tariffs or other trade restrictions, further escalating the trade tensions between the two nations.
 
The Biden administration’s move to launch a trade investigation into Chinese-made legacy semiconductors is not only a response to China’s growing dominance in the semiconductor industry but also a strategic effort to ensure the U.S. remains competitive in a sector that is essential to both economic growth and national security. The ongoing U.S.-China trade war, particularly in the semiconductor space, highlights the challenges facing both countries as they navigate the complex dynamics of globalization, technological innovation, and geopolitical rivalry. As the investigation progresses, it will be essential to watch how it unfolds and whether it leads to further actions that could reshape the future of global trade in semiconductors.
 
(Source:www.fiortune.com)